New report projects major greenhouse gas cuts with M2M implementation

Posted on 19th March 2013 in environmental, Internet of Things

For much of my career I was an environmental strategist, emphasizing new technologies that could cut waste and boost the economy. As a result, I was delighted to read a new report that projects up to 16.5% cuts in greenhouse gas emissions by 2020 with major initiatives in Machine-to-Machine (M2M) technologies — as much as could be brought about by switching to renewable energy sources.

It proves my long-held belief that the environmental movement has wrongly been associated in corporate minds for too long with sacrifice, and instead should be seen as eliminating waste and increasing efficiency. In other words, the IoT can be a win-win solution for the environment and the economy.

The report, “Machine to Machine technologies: unlocking the potential of a $1 trillion industry,” was written by the Carbon War Room with assistance by AT&T. The Carbon War Room is ” a global entrepreneurial initiative set up by Sir Richard Branson that accelerates entrepreneurial solutions to deploy profitable, scalable clean technologies across industry sectors.” It is a registered US non-profit.

The report concentrated on potential greenhouse gas reductions (and opportunities for economic growth) in four “carbon intensive” sectors of the global economy:

  • energy
  • transportation
  • built-environment
  • agriculture.

The report is predicated on a 23% annual growth rate in M2M products and services between now and 2020: from 1.3 billion devices worldwide to 12.5 billion. This should also result in almost a trillion dollars of annual revenue by the end of the decade.

The report is optimistic about the benefits of aggressive M2M growth: “if we utilize technologies such as M2M to their full potential, ‘low carbon’ will be synonymous with economic growth and sustainable prosperity, now and into the future.”

Breaking the reductions in greenhouse emissions down by sector, the report projects:

  • Energy production, distribution and use emissions could be cut by 2.0 Gt of Co2e (CO2e is the concentration of CO2 that would cause the same level of  radiant forcing as a given type and concentration of greenhouse gas) by 2020, primarily by promoting “smart grid” technologies such as smart meters and demand-response systems. M2M can also improve energy production and transmission, while fostering the transition to renewables.
  • Transportation emissions could be cut by nearly 1.9 Gt of Co2e in the same time period by optimizing routes of all transportation modes so people and goods are moved as efficiently as possible.
  • Built-environment emissions would fall by 1.6 Gt of Co2e by 2020 by increasing the efficiency of building systems such as HVAC, lighting, electronics and appliances, and security systems.
  • Agricultural emissions would drop by  1.6 Gt of Co2e “by reducing deforestation, managing livestock, and increasing the efficiency of planting, seeding, harvesting, fertilizer application and water use—allowing more food to be grown with fewer resources and saving money for farmers.”

Wow!

The report also is realistic about the many obstacles facing full deployment of M2M technologies worldwide, including:

  • Fragmented value chains that keep mobile network operators from being able to provide  complete turn-key solutions
  • Lack of universal standards that retard broad integration of M2M solutions
  • Lack of performance data that make it hard for potential clients to quantify the cost-benefit ratio of new investments in M2M solutions.
  • Communication and marketing challenges: “Companies offering M2M solutions need to be able to communicate the benefits of implementing an M2M system to various entities within a potential client company, from the procurement manager to the CFo. Not only a lack of data but also a lack of strong marketing angles is hurting the M2M industry’s ability to communicate
    the value proposition of M2M systems to potential clients.”
  • Incompatible sales models and long sales cycles since M2M pricing remains high.

It recommends a variety of strategies to overcome the obstacles, including:

  • Value chain integration and unified M2M partnerships: “Creative partnerships and mergers & acquisitions (M&A) are required if the market is to be able to unilaterally offer M2M solutions.”
  • Alternative business models and new marketing strategies.
  • Increasing emphasis on global standards.
  • Quantifying data to clarify ROI and make the benefits of investing in M2M clearer, as well as building data collection and analytics into their offerings.Companies offering M2M solutions must work (“there is also a large untapped opportunity to collect and monetize the vast amounts of data generated by M2M devices. this could take the form of an entrepreneurial venture, or a data clearing house created by the telecoms industry.”)
  • Telecom and other companies should make M2M part of their core businesses.
  • Adding innovative new business models and sales.
  • “Creating a new level of industry cohesion on communication will also be key. The (telecom) industry needs to create forums to discuss and co-ordinate efforts to increase the deployment of M2M technologies, improve its value proposition, and develop a common language to describe its benefits that resonates with customers.”

It seems to me that quantifying the greenhouse gas emissions reductions is particularly important, since so many companies have now adopted “triple-bottom line” accounting. The vast amounts of data generated by M2M applications should make that a relatively simple function to add.

Add in other environmentally-related IoT initiatives such as HP’s “CENse central nervous system for the planet” (BTW, still frustrated by HP’s unwillingness to give an up-date on its progress!) and it seems pretty clear to me: the IoT is our last, best hope to provide for needed economic growth (especially in developing nations) while simultaneously reducing the greenhouse gas emissions that threaten the planet.

 

Cisco projects $14.4 trillion future for IoT

Posted on 4th March 2013 in Internet of Things

I’ve been delinquent about posting my take on Cisco’s recent release of a white paper in which they predicted a $14.4 trillion in what they term “Value at Stake,” (a combination of increased revenues and decreased costs for companies embracing [or lost by companies that don’t embrace it) what they call the “Internet of Everything” between now and 2022).

The white paper, “Embracing the Internet of Everything to Capture Your Share of $14.4 trillion,”  is by far the most comprehensive projection on the IoT’s near-term growth, and certainly gives cause for optimism (although they warn that the benefits could be diminished if companies don’t adequately provide for robust security and privacy protections!). It’s a must read as well because of the case studies included to justify the projections: I’d strongly recommend it as a source of practical ideas to any company wondering about whether they should be launching IoT initiatives. 

The $14.4 trillion is made up of:

  • asset utilization (ugh: why do people insist on substituting “utilize” for “use”?  — a pet peeve) (or reduced costs) of $2.5 trillion
  • employee productivity (greater labor efficiencies) of $2.5 trillion
  • supply chain and logistics (eliminating waste) of $2.7 trillion
  • customer experience (addition of more customers) of $3.7 trillion
  • innovation (reducing time to market) of $3.0 trillion.

The projections are extrapolated from the benefits that companies are already realizing from early-stage IoT projects such as “smart grids, smart buildings, connected healthcare and patient monitoring, smart factories, connected private education, connected commercial (ground) vehicles, connected marketing and advertising, and connected gaming and entertainment.” The IoT’s future progress is being driven by technologies such as the cloud and economic principles such as Metcalfe’s Law.

The report reuses a favorite Cisco statistic, that 99.4% of all “things” that will eventually be linked by the IoT are not linked at this point, so the sky is the limit for the future.

I can’t emphasize it enough: this report is must reading for smart business leaders trying to understand the IoT and how to capitalize on it.

comments: Comments Off on Cisco projects $14.4 trillion future for IoT tags: , ,

NFC directory

Posted on 20th February 2013 in Internet of Things

Near-Field Communications (NFC) has the potential to transform current payment modes, as demonstrated by the Google Wallet. The field is constantly evolving, especially as new smartphones are created that include NFC.

I’ve just found a handy directory which is frequently updated that will help you keep up-to-date on NFC phones. Enjoy!

comments: Comments Off on NFC directory tags: ,

My IoT video is on the web!

Posted on 14th February 2013 in Internet of Things

I’ve yet to find a video introducing the Internet of Things to lay audiences that wasn’t a thinly-veiled ad for Cisco, IBM or GE. I’ve worked with the folks @ Medfield.TV to produce an easy-to-understand intro to the IoT that hopefully will not only build understanding among the general public, but also create a sense of enthusiasm about the changes it will bring.  Let me know your reaction!

comments: 3 » tags:

#IoT saving the Amazon

Posted on 31st January 2013 in environmental, Internet of Things

As a passionate environmentalist who’s always looking for economical win-win solutions to thorny environmental issues, this one caught my eye!

Chris Rezendes of INEX Advisors blogged recently about a great example of the IoT making a real difference, in this case in the Amazon (disclaimer: Chris is my co-organizer for a forthcoming Meetup for IoT people in New England, and he’s built me into a number of new business proposals), where two firms, Cargo Tracck  and Gemalto, teamed up to catch thieves who had switched from their former clear-cutting to more selective processes aimed at only high value trees:

“M2M modules optimized to operate in austere network and harsh physical environments in protected regions of the Amazon.  Devices are attached to trees.  A number of mechanisms are embedded in the devices to notify authorities when a tree from a protected/ managed region is harvested.  The solution operates in near-real-time, and has back-end services that have enabled authorities to more quickly apprehend poachers, keep the contraband off the market, and provide layers and layers of economic and quality of life benefits to a number of stakeholders.”

This reminds me of the project of creating a trillion-sensor  “central nervous system for the planet” including the rainforests that HP proposed several years ago as part of its CeNSE project but has not been willing to discuss recently (when I attempted to interview personnel for the project when I was writing my e-book about the IoT the company’s PR department flatly refused. Hmmm…).

One particularly interesting aspect of the program is that it uses a RED (Radiation Data Exchange) technology “that boosts effective operating ranges in austere power and network coverage environments.”  As Rezendes points out, using the RED system doesn’t rely on transmitting massive amounts of real-time data, which would create headaches in terms of big data processing and also would require larger energy supplies for the sensors. Instead, it reports “short bursty data” based on exceptions to the normal data, which would indicate out-of-the-ordinary occurrences such as harvesting of one of the trees.

Here’s how it works:

“Smaller than a deck of cards, the tiny tracking device is camouflaged in a resin case made to blend in with the trunks of trees. Ten of the devices were covertly installed in remote active harvesting areas deep in the jungle. In addition, specialized night vision cameras were installed in nearby trees to capture visual evidence of illegal logging activities. The sophisticated power management system of the Cinterion module provided superior power efficiency allowing the device to operate reliably in the field for over a year without recharging batteries. When lumber gangs harvested a tagged tree, the solution immediately began sending alarms to law enforcement officials. Cargo Tracck’s leading-edge geo-location algorithms, along with the R.E.D. boosters provided unprecedented location accuracy, delivering tracking data and alarm notification to officials as soon as harvested trees passed within 20 miles of a cellular network. This allowed officials to remotely track trees and intercept and arrest thieves in the act of selling timber at sawmills, which ultimately led to quicker prosecution.”

Is that kewl, or what?

As Rezendes points out, the system is a win-win one for all of the major publics concerned with the rainforests: residents, those licensed to responsibly harvest the trees, the government — and the planet.

Perhaps an ad hoc assemblage of discrete projects such as this one in the Amazon can achieve the vision of the “central nervous system for the planet” on the cheap.

Bravo, Cargo Tracck & Gemalto!

 

 

comments: Comments Off on #IoT saving the Amazon tags: , , , , , , , ,

HAPIfork: simple IoT innovation with big implications!

Posted on 14th January 2013 in Internet of Things

Examining the breadcrumbs left after CES:

One of the Internet of Things devices unveiled at CES that got a lot of attention — much of it silly, IMHO — was the HAPIfork, from HAPILABS. Never mind that the device is still somewhat primitive: you have to connect it to your computer’s USB port to upload statistics — a Bluetooth version won’t be out until later this year.

HAPIfork

HAPIfork

It still has a serious intent: measuring the length of time between your bites, and vibrating if you shovel the food in too quickly.  I’ve seen how effective this technique can be for weight control. We have a family friend who lived with us for most of a year, and he was the most deliberate eater I’ve ever met: he took plenty of time between bites and thoroughly chewed every piece of food. Bottom line? One of the most wiry bodies I’ve ever seen!

 

With obesity a major problem, the HAPIfork might make a real contribution to making us all more conscious, conscientious eaters, and that would be no small contribution to reducing obesity.

So let Mr. Colbert laugh: I think the HAPIfork will soon have a place in smart people’s silverware drawer!

 

 

comments: Comments Off on HAPIfork: simple IoT innovation with big implications! tags: , ,

#IoT Gets New Consortium. Huzzah!

Posted on 11th January 2013 in Internet of Things

I find it personally distressing that there’s no umbrella organization advocating for the #IoT and building public awareness of its existence. Even more, a robust association would promote contact among #IoT companies, which I’m confident would result in more synergistic apps and collaborations (one indicator of the potential? Runkeeper now has more than 100 partners through its Health Graph API for tying together different health and fitness applications, services, and devices).

That’s why I was pleased to see that 10 firms in the field announced at CES formation of The Internet of Things Consortium.  Most of them are startups, although the group does include Logitech. They are focused on home automation: “The IoT Consortium is primarily focused on those Internet enabled devices and related software services that directly touch consumers in the form of home automation, entertainment, and productivity.”

Their mission is to facilitate “cooperation between hardware, software, and service providers.  One of the goals of the consortium is to see billions of connected devices that benefit from communication with other devices and services.”

The big boys in the field have the IPSO Alliance, but its mandate is limited to advocating for “the Internet Protocol as the network for the connection of Smart Objects.”  When will we get an umbrella organization that will advocate for the IoT as a whole?

I plan to make my own small contribution to this effort by hosting a Meetup for all Boston-area researchers and companies sometime in February. Stay tuned for details!

 

 

 

 

comments: Comments Off on #IoT Gets New Consortium. Huzzah!

#IoT Award winner: Rest Devices Infant Monitor smart onsie can avoid SIDS

Posted on 1st January 2013 in Internet of Things

As a father whose infant son came home from the hospital with oxygen and a heart monitor because he’d occasionally forget to breathe (Thanks for your concern: that crisis is ended. Now our big worry is how to pay for his freshman year of college next fall….) I was most excited by the winner of the Connected Products (Body) category of Postscape’s best Internet of Things products for 2012.

The prototype (it’s unclear from the company’s website whether the monitor is actually in production) Rest Devices PeekoMIMO infant monitor Infant Monitor (the adult SleepShirt, already on the market, can help with controlling sleep apnea) “uses sensor technology to provide a constant signal of an infant’s respiration, skin temperature, and body position. And, if, for some reason, your baby stops breathing, you are alerted through your phone or tablet.” Imagine the potential reduction in number of infants’ death from SIDS if it was in widespread use.

The company, Rest Devices, has a great mission in the spirit of the Quantified Self: “We’re obsessed with making monitoring radically simple for people. Fun even.” Rest Devices is an outgrowth of all the pioneering work done at MIT on wearable computing devices.

The company’s blog says the Peeko will be in production later this year.

GE paints rosy future for “industrial internet,” its take on the IoT

Posted on 30th November 2012 in Internet of Things

GE has just released a major report, “Industrial Internet: pushing the boundaries of minds and machines,” in which it projects what it calls the “industrial internet” marrying “smart machines” and Big Data analytics could add $10 to 15 trillion — the size of the current US economy — to global GDP.

The industrial internet — which equates to GE’s own strengths, such as electrical generation and health care (surprise! surprise!) is more limited in scope than the full Internet of Things, so the numbers also indicate a bright future for the IoT as a whole (but why did they feel the need to come up with a new term rather than just trumpeting their own area of the IoT?).

Co-authors Peter C. Evans, GE’s director of global strategy and analytics, and Marco Annunziata, GE’s chief economist, write that “the deeper meshing of the digital world with the world of machines holds the potential to bring about profound transformation to global industry, and in turn to many aspects of daily life, including the way many of us do our jobs.”

The report predicts radical increases in productivity in areas in which GE has major initiatives, including health care, fuel savings and more efficient and long-lasting physical assets.

Among the highlights of the report’s findings, it predicts:

  • the industrial internet could increase average U.S. incomes by 25-40% over the next 20 years.
  • just a 1% increase in hospital efficiency could save $63 billion worldwide.
  • similarly, a 1% reduction in jet fuel use could save $30 billion over 15 years.
  • a 1% efficiency gain in gas-fired power plants worldwide could save $66 billion in fuel costs.
To achieve the savings, the authors urge companies to deploy legions of smart sensors to gather real-time data, improve cyber security, and train a new breed of “digital-mechanical” engineers.
comments: Comments Off on GE paints rosy future for “industrial internet,” its take on the IoT tags: ,

user-based insurance: great example of IoT’s pros & cons

Posted on 26th November 2012 in Internet of Things

Today’s NYTimes has a feature on the growing phenomenon of “user-based insurance,” in which your insurance rates are based on your actual driving behavior, not the proxies that insurance companies used in the past to make up for lack of information on your real driving behavior.

I was only aware of Progressive’s Snapshot, but the article reports that Allstate and StateFarm both offer similar services (I’ve read elsewhere that the concept is more widespread in Europe).

I think user-based insurance is a great example of the tradeoffs inherent in the Internet of Things.

First, the details: a small device clamps on to the diagnostic port on your car’s dashboard. Typically, the accelerometer then records data such as miles driven, time of day (the rate of accidents increases late at night), whether you make sudden stops, etc. (at least the Progressive one, and perhaps the others, does not include GPS, to avoid concerns about having your routes tracked). On the positive side, it can result in real savings for the driver, because the company can more confident that it can predict your likelihood of being in an accident than with some of the “proxy” indicators such as age that they’ve had to rely on in the past (my favorite: your credit rating. This avoids, as the story mentions, the crime of “driving while poor.”).

On the other hand, there’s the nagging concern about what a company, or, more likely, a rogue employee, could do with your information. Part of the concern is valid: Progressive mentions that the data could be subpoenaed in case of an accident. IMHO, this is one more reason why the US government must at least consider privacy and security protections for IoT users.

There’s already an important move afoot to maximize the benefits of the plug-in devices while protecting personal privacy. MIT’s CloudCar initiative is an attempt to create an open-source monitoring device whose users would be firmly in control of who could use their driving data and how.  As I wrote in my e-book on the IoT:

“One current telematics research project is noteworthy not only in its own right, but because it addresses one of the prime obstacles to the IoT: lack of global communication standards.

“The goal of the CloudCar project, initiated by MIT’s Field Intelligence Lab, is to create a universal, open standard that can be used throughout the automotive telematics industry. That’s important, because currently there is a bewildering array of communications protocols, since each of the car manufacturers and other vendors are working on proprietary projects, ranging from Ford and Microsoft’s Sync to GM’s OnStar.

“If any of the truly remarkable telematics applications, such as ones that automatically warn of impending road danger proposed by BMW on their ConnectedDrive platform, are to become a reality, a common standard is needed. As Erik J. Wilhelm of the Field Intelligence Lab says, ‘Manufacturers have no compulsion to share with other manufacturers, so there’s no opportunity for really great applications such as hyper-accurate traffic mapping which would only work if everyone is talking the same language.’

“MIT is currently self-funding the CloudCar project, which resembles Arduino in several important ways: the heart of the system is a simpler controller, now in it’s fourth generation, which would plug into the car’s diagnostic port, would be user-friendly, and would allow streaming of data from the car to a wide range of 3rd party vendors, who could use it for everything from  car sharing applications to automated roadside assistance systems.

“This hardware will be open-source, and the standard underpinning the data server will also be open. The Field Intelligence Lab hopes to have about 10,000 of the units in the field by the end of 2012. The users would pay a modest fee, with the remainder of the cost to be picked up by third parties that would be able to use the data the boxes yield if drivers grant them permission.  ‘Everyone needs the same data for all of these potential applications, although some need it more immediately while other need to make certain it is more accurate. Safety and security is central to our design efforts because we have to make certain cars won’t just stop in the middle of the road,’ he says.  If the CloudCar standard is widely adopted, application developers could be gathering and sharing information from millions and millions of cars.

“The mindset fostered by the CloudCar project could be as valuable as the standard itself.

“ ‘Ford and GM both have announced they were opening up their proprietary products such as OnStar, but they are  only giving access to big companies, not the creative commons space. If you’re all speaking the same language, everyone wins and it’s still possible to have a survival-of-the-fittest application market that mobile phone users have come to expect, only this time with many more data streams and possibilities,’ Wilhelm says.

“Wilhelm hopes that the CloudCar standard will have value beyond telematics, since other crucial segments of the IoT, such as medical reporting and home applications are also handicapped by the lack of communication standards. ‘CloudCars are nearer term, offers the most immediate gains, and faster adoption rates than these fields,” he says. “We hope to further apply our learning to CloudHome and CloudMe.’”

Aside: why don’t companies promote user-based insurance more aggressively? Progressive does run ads for it (although I don’t think most people would understand the  concept from the ad), but I hadn’t seen any promotion for the Allstate and StateFarm services.

comments: 2 »
http://www.stephensonstrategies.com/">Stephenson blogs on Internet of Things Internet of Things strategy, breakthroughs and management